Assessing the quality control of self-consolidating concrete properties

Cattaneo, S and Mola, F (2012) Assessing the quality control of self-consolidating concrete properties. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 138(2), pp. 197-205. ISSN 0733-9364

Abstract

The results of a quality-control operation performed on the jobsite of a large volume of ready-mix self-consolidating concrete (SCC) are presented. To test the prerequisites of fresh SCC, three tests (slump flow [SF], V-Funnel [VF], and J-Ring [JR]) were prescribed to be performed on every truck. The acceptance condition for the supplied concrete was to meet the specified requirements for all three tests. This procedure seems adequate to derive reliable data about filling ability, resistance to segregation, deformation capacity, viscosity, and passing ability. The correlation between slump-flow and J-ring results suggests that these two tests could be associated by defining a proper reduced J-ring diameter and by checking the difference in height between the concrete inside and outside the ring. In general, it seems that a continuous control should be applied only on specific structures, such as structures with highly congested reinforcement, whereas when the stability of the supplies is achieved, a reduced testing control could be applied for ordinary structures. However, whatever the type of construction, in extreme weather conditions (very hot/cold) special care should be taken, and it could be necessary to increase the number of controls because under these conditions a higher probability of nonconformance to the guidelines was observed.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: fresh state properties; quality control; self-consolidating concrete
Index terms: stability, testing, reinforcement, self-consolidating concrete, deformation, quality control, weather
Subjects: building materials, professional practice, material properties and characteristics, structural engineering, air quality, project delivery
Topics: Quality Management, Sustainability, Engineering Principles, Construction Materials
Descriptive scope: 2 PC

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here