El-Diraby, T E (2012) Epistemology of construction informatics. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 138(1), pp. 53-65. ISSN 0733-9364
Abstract
Informatics deal with knowledge management and not just information technology, which, by its very nature, is social, cognitive, and tied to linguistics and human communication. Consequently, philosophy plays a major role in informatics because one has to understand in a human and not artificial way the meaning of concepts, their relationships, and their frames of references (context). Over the last few years, this has manifested in the development of many ontologies (a formal description of what knowledge is known). Epistemology, the means by which one knows or creates assumptions about knowledge, did not receive its due attention. This paper establishes the need for investigating the epistemological foundations of construction informatics systems, reviews related schools of epistemology in general philosophy and in that of science, reviews the rather limited and indirect use of epistemology in construction research, and presents a proposal for an epistemology for construction informatics. Such epistemology is meant to act as guidelines for the development of informatics systems and, more importantly, the ontologies they use. The proposed epistemology (1) advocates the use of constructivist models (bottom-up approach) at the microlevel (individual models) within a contemporary pragmatic framework, i.e., acceptance of dualism and probabilistic coexistence and focus on usability and benefit to users, at the macrolevel in which models should be linked to one other effectively to present a value for users; (2) emphasizes the need for context modeling along with concept modeling; (3) calls for balancing object orientation (top-down standardization) with prototype orientation (discovery and situational awareness) in concept development; and (4) balancing communication (linguistic orientation) along with the prevailing reasoning orientation.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | informatics; knowledge management; ontology; semantic systems; theory of construction |
| Index terms: | information technology, knowledge management, prototype, meaning, science, usability, informatic, philosophy, ontology, reasoning, proposal, modelling, bottom-up approach, foundations, epistemology, standardization, human communication |
| Subjects: | information science, philosophical studies, cognitive psychology, sociology, professional development, education and knowledge transfer, structural engineering, performance measurement, analytical methods, project planning, modelling and simulation, urban planning, knowledge theory, human factors and perception, computing systems, specialized education, user-centered design |
| Topics: | Quality Management, Digital Applications, Design Practice, Education, Engineering Principles, Information Management, Research Practice, Project Management, Governance |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PCT |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here