Elghamrawy, T; El-Rayes, K; Liu, L and Odeh, I (2012) Performance of temporary rumble strips at the edge of highway construction zones. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 138(8), pp. 923-930. ISSN 0733-9364
Abstract
This paper describes the results of field experiments conducted to evaluate the performance of temporary rumble strips at the edge of work zones as a new safety measure to prevent inattentive drivers from encroaching onto the work area in a manner similar to the way permanent rumble strips are used. The two main objectives of these experiments are to (1) analyze and compare the effectiveness of various layouts of temporary rumble strips and (2) provide practical recommendations to improve the design and layout of temporary rumble strips. The experiments evaluated the impact of five parameters on the effectiveness of temporary rumble strips and their generated sound levels: (1) rumble strip type; (2) number of strips per set; (3) strip spacing; (4) vehicle type; and (5) vehicle speed. A total of 162 different combinations of these parameters were tested to evaluate their individual and collective impact on the effectiveness of temporary rumble strips. The findings of this study indicate that temporary rumble strips at the edge of work zones generate adequate sound levels to alert inattentive drivers. The results of the experiments also indicate that the effectiveness of temporary rumble strips can be improved by (1) increasing the number of strips per set as practically as feasible and (2) using temporary rumble strips with larger widths.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | correlation analysis; highway construction; safety; sound measurement; temporary rumble strips; work zones |
| Index terms: | experiment, correlation analysis, highway construction, effectiveness |
| Subjects: | data collection methods, civil engineering, performance management, statistical analysis |
| Topics: | Quality Management, Engineering Principles, Research Practice |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here