Esmaeili, B and Hallowell, M R (2012) Diffusion of safety innovations in the construction industry. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 138(8), pp. 955-963. ISSN 0733-9364
Abstract
Safety performance in the construction industry has improved significantly in the past four decades. This improvement has been attributed in part to the increased implementation of injury prevention strategies. Although the relative effectiveness of these strategies has been studied in previous research, there has been no attempt to evaluate their diffusion. To address this gap in knowledge, 12 highly effective administrative safety innovations were identified in literature, and 58 firms were interviewed to investigate their adoption rate. The diffusion patterns of the identified safety innovations were explored using four common innovation diffusion models: the internal, external, Bass, and Gompetz. The findings indicate that the internal and Bass models have the highest explanatory power and that internal factors are the most influential factors in adoption of safety innovations by construction firms. It was also found that project-specific training and safety meetings (91%), frequent worksite inspections (91%), and safety and health orientation and training (90%) are the three most commonly adopted safety innovations, and employment of a site safety manager (62%), subcontractor selection and management (64%), and substance abuse programs (69%) were the three innovations most infrequently implemented. The implication of the findings is that the construction industry has now reached saturation with respect to traditional injury prevention strategies and new safety innovations are needed.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | diffusion; safety; safety management |
| Index terms: | effectiveness, implementation, prevention, construction industry, explanatory power, employment, inspection, influential factor, program, safety management, safety performance, subcontractor selection, manager, innovation diffusion, injury, strategy, construction firm |
| Subjects: | contractual arrangements, practitioner, risk assessment, organization, industry analysis, quality assurance, occupational health and safety management, sociology, health conditions and diseases, financial risk, management, theoretical framing, performance management, software systems |
| Topics: | Digital Applications, Supply Chain Management, Quality Management, Human Resources, Health and Safety, Business Strategy, Cost Management, Research Practice, Risk Management, Roles and Professions, Procurement |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCTA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here