Fong, P S W and Chen, L (2012) Governance of learning mechanisms: Evidence from construction firms. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 138(9), pp. 1053-1064. ISSN 0733-9364
Abstract
The focus of knowledge management (KM) in the construction industry is moving towards capability building for value creation. The study reported by this paper is motivated by recent assertions about the genesis and evolution of knowledge management capability (KMC) in the strategic management field. It attempts to shed light on the governance of learning mechanisms that develop KMC within the context of construction firms. A questionnaire survey was administered to a sample of construction contractors operating in the very dynamic Hong Kong market to elicit opinions on the learning mechanisms and business outcomes of targeted firms. On the basis of a total of 149 usable responses, structural equation modeling (SEM) analysis identified relationships among knowledge-governance mechanisms, knowledge processes, and business performance, thereby supporting the existence of strategic learning loops. The study findings provide evidence from the construction context for capability assertions that knowledge-governance mechanisms and processes form learning mechanisms that carry out strategic learning to create value, effect performance outcomes, and ultimately drive the evolution of KMC. The findings imply that it is feasible for managing construction firms to govern learning mechanisms through managing the capability-based holistic KM system, thereby reconfiguring KMC to match needs in the dynamic market environment over time.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | construction companies; contractors; evaluation; knowledge-based systems; performance characteristics |
| Index terms: | construction industry, knowledge-based system, Hong Kong, performance outcome, governance, construction contractor, knowledge management, evolution, strategic management, value creation, evidence, questionnaire, business performance, structural equation modelling, survey, construction company, construction firm |
| Subjects: | artificial intelligence, environmental science, value management, practitioner, business, organization, data collection methods, evaluation and assessment methods, statistical analysis, industry analysis, professional development, Geography, economic development, management, performance measurement |
| Topics: | Quality Management, Digital Applications, Sustainability, Governance, Roles and Professions, Research Practice, Project Management, Geographical Context, Information Management, Business Strategy |
| Descriptive scope: | 5 PCTEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here