Flagger illumination during nighttime construction and maintenance operations

Gambatese, J A and Rajendran, S (2012) Flagger illumination during nighttime construction and maintenance operations. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 138(2), pp. 250-257. ISSN 0733-9364

Abstract

Ensuring the safety of flaggers, motorists, and workers is the primary consideration for flagging operations during nighttime construction and maintenance. A research study was conducted to evaluate four different types of light equipment-a light tower, 12 V spotlight, 12 V high-intensity discharge (HID) floodlight, and balloon lights-with regards to their level of illumination and uniformity over the flagging area and on the flagger's body. For each type of equipment, three input variables-lamp output, offset angle, and luminaire height-were varied to create a total of 44 different light equipment configurations. Each configuration was evaluated in terms of illumination, uniformity, and visibility in an urban/suburban setting. The study revealed that a light tower with 2,000 W output, 0 offset angle, and raised to a height of 20feet was the highest ranked type of equipment. However, when ease of use, mobility, and cost were added as output measures, a 12 V spotlight with 0 offset angle and raised to a height of 10feet received the highest ranking. Smaller light systems are easy to operate and transport, inexpensive, and more applicable for short-term flagging operations and for operations that need to be relocated frequently. Highly ranked configurations were typically those at 0 offset with luminaires elevated to 10feet or higher. Configurations with higher luminaire heights and lamp outputs from 250 to 2,000 W may perform better depending on the roadway setting, duration of flagging operation, and amount of artificial background lighting.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: construction; flagger; illumination; lighting; nighttime; safety
Index terms: duration, mobility, configuration
Subjects: infrastructure and transport systems, systems engineering, project controls
Topics: Time Control, Urban Studies, Engineering Principles
Descriptive scope: 1 C

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here