Han, S; Lee, S and Peña-Mora, F (2012) Identification and quantification of non-value-adding effort from errors and changes in design and construction projects. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 138(1), pp. 98-109. ISSN 0733-9364
Abstract
In a design and construction project, non-value-adding effort (NVAE; also called non-value-adding activities) is wasted effort that could have been avoided if the project had been more carefully planned, executed, monitored, and controlled. NVAE is considered the main contributor to schedule delays and cost overruns in design and construction projects. Microlevel analyses such as work sampling and resource balance charts have been applied extensively to identify and minimize NVAE. These methods can pinpoint unnecessary steps in a highly repetitive construction activity and are most effective when analyzing activities with low performance variation in each cycle. However, microlevel analyses lack the capabilities to deal with errors and changes that usually result in significant performance variations, although they are a major trigger of NVAE in design and construction projects. To address this deficiency, this paper outlines the development of a system dynamics-based model for analysis on a macrolevel. The model's application to a bridge project in Massachusetts revealed that it can effectively identify and quantify NVAE particularly triggered by errors and changes, and can capture the propagation of NVAE between interrelated activities. On the basis of results, this paper concluded that the developed model can be utilized as a management tool to bring a more comprehensive understanding of NVAE in design and construction projects, which in turn can lead to a greater reduction in NVAE.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | change management; production management; productivity; simulation |
| Index terms: | design and construction, schedule delay, system dynamics, quantification, non-value-adding activity, repetitive construction, change management, productivity, production management, cost overrun, bridge project, propagation, sampling, variation |
| Subjects: | management, data collection methods, project controls, computing systems, measurement and scaling, infrastructure and transport systems, contractual arrangements, engineering process, financial and cost management, building construction, contractual condition, project delivery |
| Topics: | Cost Management, Contract Administration, Time Control, Project Management, Organizational Design, Business Strategy, Procurement, Digital Applications, Construction Technology, Research Practice, Engineering Principles |
| Descriptive scope: | 5 PCTEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here