Hanna, A S; Tadt, E J and Whited, G C (2012) Request for information: Benchmarks and metrics for major highway projects. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 138(12), pp. 1347-1352. ISSN 0733-9364
Abstract
A request for information (RFI) is a formal written procedure initiated by the contractor seeking additional information or clarification for issues related to design, construction, and other contract documents. Large numbers of RFIs along with slow responses to RFIs are frequently cited as a metric for poor project performance. Implementation of an RFI process is an integral part of successful project management for construction projects that improves communication between the construction, design, and project management teams. The use of RFIs is common in vertical construction, but is just gaining use and acceptance in the delivery of transportation infrastructure projects. The purpose of this paper is to benchmark the RFI process and develop benchmarks and metrics to aid project teams in assessing the performance of a transportation infrastructure project and to provide best practices for improving the overall RFI process. Data on RFIs were collected from major highway construction projects in the Midwest including more than 65 bridges and 90.123 km (56 mi) of roadway totaling $857.3 million of construction, in which two quantitative metrics were established for monitoring project performance. In addition, the paper provides reason codes developed for categorizing the type of RFI submitted and a method to identify problem areas.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | benchmark; highways; project management; request for information; transportation |
| Index terms: | transportation infrastructure, monitoring, implementation, highway construction, project management team, construction project, contract document, project team, project performance, project management, best practice |
| Subjects: | contractual condition, project management theory and practice, civil engineering, business, control systems, contractual arrangements, profession, infrastructure and transport systems, production management, project delivery |
| Topics: | Business Strategy, Roles and Professions, Site Management, Project Management, Procurement, Contract Administration, Engineering Principles |
| Descriptive scope: | 2 PC |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here