Cost-benefit analysis for accident prevention in construction projects

Ikpe, E; Hammon, F and Oloke, D (2012) Cost-benefit analysis for accident prevention in construction projects. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 138(8), pp. 991-998. ISSN 0733-9364

Abstract

Construction is the most dangerous land-based work sector in Europe and the United States The cost of accidents has received much attention in the recent past, and online interactive tools were developed to assess the cost of accidents to organizations. Online tools and other sources of information on costs of accidents in the construction industry were a useful development but failed to support the decisionmaking process in regard to construction health and safety measures. A cost-benefit analysis (CBA) methodology is presented that would enable contractors to assess the true cost of accidents prevention and the associated benefits of accident prevention as part of pre- and postcontract project evaluation. The research investigated the cost and benefit of accident prevention, with a view to drawing attention to the economic consequences of effective/ineffective management of health and safety by contractors. A quantitative research methodology was employed in investigating these costs and benefits within the UK construction industry. The results of ratio analyses indicate that the benefits of accident prevention far outweigh the costs of accident prevention by a ratio of approximately 3:1. Further, the results demonstrate that for every £1 spent on accident prevention, contractors gained £3 as benefits. The results also show that small contractors spend relatively higher proportions of their turnover on accident prevention than medium- and large-sized contractors and that small- and medium-sized contractors gain relatively higher proportions of their turnover, in total, as benefits of accident prevention than large contractors. It is concluded that the CBA method can provide a guide to contractor's decision making in regard to accident prevention. When acted upon, the method has the potential to contribute to a reduction in costs, deaths, and injuries in the UK construction industry and possibly in other areas internationally.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: accident prevention; cba; construction industry
Index terms: drawing, injury, health and safety, turnover, accident prevention, United States, construction project, decision-making, methodology, ratio analysis, Europe, quantitative research, project evaluation, land, construction industry, prevention
Subjects: financial risk, production management, health safety and environment, Geography, research methods, physical geography and landforms, environmental health, industry analysis, health conditions and diseases, decision analysis, value management, economic analysis, business management, data analysis and analytics, real estate economics, technical documentation
Topics: Research Practice, Project Management, Geographical Context, Health and Safety, Business Strategy, Cost Management, Sustainability, Risk Management, Urban Studies, Design Practice
Descriptive scope: 4 PCTA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here