Buildability factors influencing concreting labor productivity

Jarkas, A M (2012) Buildability factors influencing concreting labor productivity. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 138(1), pp. 89-97. ISSN 0733-9364

Abstract

Improving labor productivity of in situ reinforced concrete construction is necessary because of the importance of this material to the industry. Several factors influence labor productivity, but buildability is among the most important. Despite the plethora of research into construction productivity reported over the years, a thorough examination of the literature revealed a dearth of research into the effects of buildability factors on the efficiency of the concreting operation. Because concreting is an integral, labor intensive, trade of in situ reinforced concrete construction, the objective of this research is to explore the influence of primary buildability factors on concreting labor productivity. In achieving this objective, a sufficiently large volume of productivity data was collected and analyzed by using the categorical-regression method. As a result, the effects and relative influence of: (1) concrete workability; (2) reinforcing steel congestion; (3) volume of pours; and (4) height relative to ground level, on labor productivity of skipped and pumped placement methods are determined and quantified. The findings show significant impacts of factors investigated on the efficiency of the concreting operation, which can provide designers with feedback on how well their designs consider the requirements of the buildability concept, and the tangible consequences of their decisions on the productivity of the operatives. Practical recommendations, moreover, are presented, which upon implementations, may improve the buildability level of this trade, thus translate into higher labor productivity and lower labor cost. On the other hand, the depicted patterns of results can provide guidance to construction managers for effective planning and efficient labor and plant utilization.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: buildability; categorical-regression; concrete volume; efficiency; height; labor productivity; pumped concrete; reinforcing steel congestion ratio; skipped concrete; workability
Index terms: efficiency, designer, productivity, labour productivity, in-situ, labour cost, operative, implementation, construction productivity, buildability, workability, placement, reinforced concrete construction, reinforcing steel, construction manager, concreting
Subjects: performance management, management, cost management, design efficiency, building construction, practitioner, design methods, profession, contractual arrangements, building materials, operations management
Topics: Design Practice, Human Resources, Quality Management, Site Management, Business Strategy, Construction Materials, Engineering Principles, Project Management, Roles and Professions, Procurement, Construction Technology
Descriptive scope: 3 PCA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here