Jarkas, A M (2012) Influence of buildability factors on rebar installation labor productivity of columns. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 138(2), pp. 258-267. ISSN 0733-9364
Abstract
Buildability is one of the most important factors influencing labor productivity. A thorough investigation of the literature, however, revealed a dearth of research into its effects on the labor productivity of an integral trade of the in situ reinforced concrete material; namely, rebar installation, especially at the activity levels. Because reinforced concrete columns are among the major encountered activities on construction sites, the objective of this research is to explore primary buildability factors influencing their rebar installation labor productivity. To achieve this objective, a sufficiently large volume of productivity data was collected and analyzed by using multiple and categorical-interaction-regression methods. As a result, the effects of the variability of column sizes, rebar diameter size, reinforcement quantity, and column geometry, are determined and quantified. Although the extent of the size variability and circular geometry show significant negative impacts on the labor efficiency of the operation, the rebar diameter size and quantity of reinforcement installed exhibit positive effects. The results obtained may be used to provide designers and construction managers with feedback on how well the design of this activity considers the requirements of buildability, and the consequences of designers' decisions on the productivity of the installation operation. Moreover, a set of practical recommendations is presented, which upon implementation can improve the design buildability level of the activity explored and, thus, translate into higher labor productivity and more efficient planning and utilization of operatives.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | buildability; characteristic rebar diameter; efficiency; labor productivity; rationalization; rebar installation; reinforced concrete columns; standardization |
| Index terms: | buildability, column, construction site, construction manager, reinforced concrete, geometry, efficiency, designer, productivity, rebar, labour productivity, investigation, standardization, reinforcement, in-situ, operative, variability, interaction, implementation |
| Subjects: | practitioner, profession, data collection methods, mathematical modelling, contractual arrangements, building materials, work location, structural engineering, performance measurement, management, performance management, design efficiency, statistical analysis, behavioral psychology, building construction |
| Topics: | Site Management, Design Practice, Quality Management, Roles and Professions, Procurement, Business Strategy, Construction Materials, Engineering Principles, Research Practice |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PCA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here