Kikuchi, S; Kronprasert, N and Easa, S M (2012) Aggregate blending using fuzzy optimization. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 138(12), pp. 1411-1420. ISSN 0733-9364
Abstract
Aggregate blending is a process that blends available aggregates to create a blend that meets gradation specifications while minimizing the unit cost of the blend. Today's aggregate blending process is a multiobjective optimization problem that involves not only minimizing cost but also satisfying other specifications of the blend, such as fineness modulus, plasticity index, and specific gravity. Gradation limits are usually expressed in terms of the range of the percentage passing each sieve. In the traditional approach, rigid values are used for the gradation limits, and as a result, gradation and other specifications are frequently met at the limits during optimization, which is not particularly desirable. This paper proposes an approach for aggregate blending using fuzzy optimization method. The approach selects the best mix of aggregates such that not only are the individual gradation specifications met within the specification limits, but also their desirability within each range is satisfied as much as possible. In the proposed model, functions that represent the decision maker's satisfaction with respect to the blend's unit cost and physical properties are introduced. The proposed model is compared with two traditional optimization models using the example data found in two previous models. The results show that the proposed approach is useful for real-world application as it is robust in terms of its ability to deal with many constraints and objectives, the practitioner's uncertainty about the limits of the specification ranges, and the desire to achieve different objectives.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | aggregate blending; construction materials; fuzzy optimization; mixture design; multiobjective optimization |
| Index terms: | aggregate, fuzzy optimization, unit cost, practitioner, satisfaction, physical property, construction material, specification |
| Subjects: | material properties and characteristics, building materials, practitioner, materials science, financial and cost management, contractual condition, project delivery, algorithms |
| Topics: | Cost Management, Contract Administration, Construction Materials, Project Management, Roles and Professions, Digital Applications, Engineering Principles |
| Descriptive scope: | 2 PC |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here