Kog, Y C and Loh, P K (2012) Critical success factors for different components of construction projects. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 138(4), pp. 520-528. ISSN 0733-9364
Abstract
The present study attempts to distinguish the different critical success factors (CSFs) for different components of construction projects as perceived by different professions, i.e.,civil and structural engineers, mechanical and electrical engineers, architects, and quantity surveyors. An analytical hierarchy process (AHP) is adopted to solicit the consistent subjective judgment of 27 experts in construction to identify the top 10 CSFs from 67 factors describing aspects of project characteristics, contractual arrangements, project participants, and interactive processes. The views of the different professionals are shaped by the experience they gained from their involvement in the respective components of the construction projects under their charge. It follows that the CSFs identified by the professionals are naturally relevant to the components of construction projects that they are familiar with. The present study reveals that the respective top 10 CSFs for the schedule, budget, and quality performance of architectural works, civil and structural works, and mechanical and electrical engineering works are markedly different. Moreover, the study shows that the judgment with regard to CSFs of respondents with less than 15years of experience differs from that of the more experienced respondents and hence may not be good enough. It follows that studies reported in the existing literature that have included views of respondents with less than 15years' experience in construction or based on the views of professionals predominantly from a particular discipline are likely to be biased and misleading.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | analytical hierarchy process; construction professionals; critical success factors; project objectives |
| Index terms: | quantity surveying, electrical engineer, construction professional, quality performance, architect, electrical engineering, profession, structural engineer, construction project, critical success factor, judgment, analytical hierarchy process |
| Subjects: | control systems, profession, professional development, institututions, production management, project delivery, dispute resolution, civil engineering, decision-making and optimization |
| Topics: | Roles and Professions, Project Management, Research Practice, Engineering Principles, Legal Issues, Information Management, Quality Management |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCTA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here