Lee, D E; Lim, T K and Arditi, D (2012) Stochastic project financing analysis system for construction. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 138(3), pp. 376-389. ISSN 0733-9364
Abstract
This paper presents an automated tool named the stochastic project financing analysis system (SPFA). The system makes use of critical path method (CPM) schedule data exported from Primavera Project Planner (P3), computes the best-fit probability distribution functions (PDFs) of historical activity durations, assigns to respective activities the probability density functions identified, simulates the schedule network, computes the deterministic and stochastic project cashflows, plots the corresponding cash-flow diagrams, and estimates the best-fitPDFs of overdraft and net profit of a project without user intervention at any time. The SPFA improves the reliability of project cash-flow analysis by effectively dealing with the uncertainties of the activities' durations and costs, increases the usability of the schedule data obtained from commercial CPM software, allows the user to incorporate the contractual terms of payment into the cashflow, and effectively handles the variability of the overdrafts and net profits by finding their best-fitPDF. It is implemented as an easy-to-use computer tool programmed in matrix laboratory (MATLAB). The SPFA allows a financial manager to estimate the extent of cash-flow problems in a specific period by using both deterministic and stochastic modes. Two test cases verify the usability and validity of the system in practice
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | cashflow; financing; project financing; scheduling; simulation; stochastic processes |
| Index terms: | test case, usability, density, validity, contractual term, duration, laboratory, probability distribution, estimate, planner, financing, scheduling, critical path method, manager, profit, variability |
| Subjects: | analytical methods, research management, financial and cost management, profession, statistical analysis, economic analysis, operations research, practitioner, user-centered design, contract structure, project controls, evaluation and assessment methods, professional practice |
| Topics: | Design Practice, Time Control, Business Strategy, Cost Management, Roles and Professions, Urban Studies, Engineering Principles, Contract Administration, Research Practice |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PCA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here