Prediction of financial contingency for asphalt resurfacing projects using artificial neural networks

Lhee, S C; Issa, R R A and Flood, I (2012) Prediction of financial contingency for asphalt resurfacing projects using artificial neural networks. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 138(1), pp. 22-30. ISSN 0733-9364

Abstract

Historically, actual construction costs have tended to exceed initial cost estimates and budgets. Often this discrepancy is significant enough to cause problems such as depletions of budgets, disputes, and reductions in work quality. Cost contingency is an important element included in the base cost estimate to protect construction participants including owners, contractors, and architects from the risks associated with underestimating project cost estimates and overrunning cost budgets. Typically, project participants have simply calculated contingency as a fixed percentage of project cost in spite of the importance of contingency. The uniform application of this deterministic method to calculate contingency on the basis of project costs only is not appropriate for all construction projects. This paper identifies factors that influence contingency and proposes a new method for predicting the owner's financial contingency on transportation construction projects using an artificial neural network (ANN)-based method. Asphalt resurfacing works among transportation projects sponsored by the Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) completed from 2004-2006 are used for this study. The results show the viability of the ANN approach in the prediction of contingency. Accurate predictions of contingencies using this approach can help project administrators better manage contingency requirements on financing projects, allowing a more optimal usage of available project funds.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: artificial neural networks; asphalt resurfacing; cost contingency; cost estimates; project owners; risk and uncertainty; transportation construction projects
Index terms: estimate, dispute, transportation project, depletion, architect, construction project, owner, cost estimate, artificial neural network, financing, construction cost, project cost
Subjects: dispute resolution, sociology, modelling and simulation, economics, environmental resource management, profession, financial and cost management, infrastructure and transport systems, production management, economic analysis
Topics: Sustainability, Legal Issues, Business Strategy, Cost Management, Stakeholder Management, Roles and Professions, Project Management, Engineering Principles, Research Practice
Descriptive scope: 2 PC

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here