Mathematical models for predicting organizational flexibility of construction firms in Singapore

Lim, B T H; Ling, F Y Y; Ibbs, C W; Raphael, B and Ofori, G (2012) Mathematical models for predicting organizational flexibility of construction firms in Singapore. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 138(3), pp. 361-375. ISSN 0733-9364

Abstract

The ability to predict and develop organizational flexibility is important for firms to survive and prosper in volatile business environments. The aim of this study is to investigate the constituents of and the constructs for predicting organizational flexibility. The specific objectives are to ascertain the relative importance of different constituents of flexibility and to construct and validate mathematical models to predict organizational flexibility of Singaporean construction firms. The research was conducted by a questionnaire survey and data were collected by face-to-face interviews with 41 construction industry experts. Three mathematical models were developed and validated by using the structural equation modeling (SEM) technique. The validation data consisted of ratings provided by four subject matter experts whose data were not used in the model development. The results show that the mathematical model for predicting strategic flexibility is able to predict to a good level of accuracy. The models show that the cost leadership initiative and supply chain capabilities of firms are the most important factors driving organizational flexibility. It is recommended that construction industry practitioners use the mathematical models that were developed to make a preliminary assessment on their firm's flexibility potential.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: business management; construction companies; construction firms; flexibility; operational flexibility; organizations; Singapore; strategic flexibility; tactical flexibility
Index terms: construction industry, Singapore, model development, business management, validation, questionnaire, practitioner, structural equation modelling, face, survey, construction company, accuracy, construction firm, relative importance, interview, mathematical model
Subjects: industry analysis, statistical analysis, Geography, professional development, analytical methods, psychology, practitioner, data collection methods, risk assessment, mathematical modelling, business, organization
Topics: Business Strategy, Information Management, Engineering Principles, Research Practice, Geographical Context, Risk Management, Roles and Professions, Organizational Design
Descriptive scope: 5 PCTEA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here