Best, R and Purdey, B (2012) Assessing occupant comfort in an iconic sustainable education building. Construction Economics and Building, 12(3), pp. 55-65. ISSN 2204-9029
Abstract
The building that houses the Mirvac School of Sustainable Development at Bond University is the first educational building to achieve a six Green Star rating from the Green Building Council of Australia. It has won numerous awards since opening in August 2008 including being judged the RICS (Royal Institution of Chartered Surveyors) Sustainable Building of 2009. After more than two years in use a post-occupancy evaluation study was carried out to assess the performance of the building from the viewpoint of the users; both resident staff and transient students. Results for factors such as lighting, thermal comfort, noise and air quality were compared to benchmarks established by the Usable Buildings Trust. The evaluation also assessed the occupants' perceptions of the building's impact on their own productivity. Users generally find the building provides a comfortable work environment although a number of areas of performance were noted as posing some concerns. These included intrusive noise in some parts of the building and some issues with glare in daylit teaching spaces. Such concerns were found to be in accord with the results of previous studies and they highlight some recurrent problems in "green" buildings designed to maximise the use of natural ventilation and natural light. These design challenges and how occupant satisfaction is to be measured and benchmarked are also discussed in the context of this comparative building study.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | education facility; green building; post occupancy evaluation; usable buildings |
| Index terms: | Australia, natural light, post-occupancy evaluation, sustainable development, productivity, natural ventilation, comfort, green building, work environment, glare, occupant satisfaction, educational building, thermal comfort, sustainable building, Royal Institution of Chartered Surveyors, air quality |
| Subjects: | professional institution, building performance, occupational health and safety management, environmental engineering, evaluation methods, user-centered design, construction type, design practice, management, sustainable construction, climate science, Geography, health safety and environment |
| Topics: | Organizational Design, Design Practice, Quality Management, Roles and Professions, Sustainability, Construction Technology, Health and Safety, Business Strategy, Geographical Context |
| Descriptive scope: | 2 PC |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here