Asimakopoulou, E; Anumba, C J and Bouchlaghem, N M (2004) Emergency response management: A review of current approaches. In: Khosrowshahi, F (ed.) Proceedings of 20th Annual ARCOM Conference, 1-3 September 2004, Edinburgh, UK.
Abstract
As is commonly known, there is a tight and complex relationship between infrastructure and lifelines. In this respect, civil engineers try to improve construction methods, materials and other aspects directly related to the strength and durability of buildings. Although individual structures may be designed to cope with unexpected events, such as earthquakes of a certain magnitude, there are instances where seismic activity can exceed the specifications and cause catastrophic results. As there is no method to foresee earthquakes, there will always be a concern to prove the structures' adequacy. When failures occur, there is the need for effective processes for emergency response - as part of the disaster management process - to control and manage available resources to save lives, property and the environment. Local authorities, rescue teams and civil engineers are called to work together to collect, analyse and assess relevant data via collaborative environments in order for an accurate picture to be pieced together. This paper reviews current approaches to emergency response management in earthquake situations and explores the extent of ICT usage. The pros and cons of existing processes are analysed and the opportunities for improvement identified. This paper concludes by presenting the problems caused by the incompatibility of data across distributed environments, the high stress of participants, the lack of common terminology between them, the breakdown of communication and information technologies, and finally the need for simultaneous interactions of decision makers for managing emergencies.
| Item Type: | Conference Paper (Paper) |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | earthquakes; emergency response; disaster management |
| Index terms: | local authority, emergency response, durability, civil engineer, construction method, specification, interaction, disaster management, information technology, earthquake |
| Subjects: | computing systems, profession, material degradation and durability, contractual condition, financial risk, safety engineering, behavioral psychology, environmental hazards, building construction, sociology |
| Topics: | Sustainability, Roles and Professions, Stakeholder Management, Research Practice, Construction Materials, Cost Management, Health and Safety, Contract Administration, Site Management, Digital Applications |
| Descriptive scope: | 2 PC |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here