Moret, Y and Einstein, H H (2012) Experience in expert estimation of probabilities and correlations for rail line construction. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 138(9), pp. 1103-1106. ISSN 0733-9364
Abstract
To counteract cost escalation and delays in infrastructure construction, an estimation model has been developed that simulates project uncertainty with probability distributions, correlations, and disruptive events. When applied to a new rail line project, three model inputs were not available from the designers: time distributions, cost correlations, and probability of occurrence and cost/time impacts of disruptive events. Experts in the field of tunnel-, viaduct-, and earthwork construction were asked to estimate the unavailable information. This paper presents a brief overview of biases that occur when experts estimate probabilities, the calibration steps taken to prevent the experts from being affected by such biases, and example questions from the questionnaire, followed by an in-depth discussion of findings. Unexpectedly, the experts followed radically different estimation techniques: the tunnel expert recalled values from past projects, the viaduct expert calculated the required values, while the earthwork expert estimated the mode value, and from it, the extreme values. Depending on estimation technique, a bias influences or cannot influence an expert. It was also observed that experts not familiar with probability theory encountered major difficulties in correlation estimation, despite concept explanation and visualization. Thus, for a successful correlation estimation it is paramount that experts be acquainted with probability theory in addition to being knowledgeable in their fields.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | biases; expert interviews; probability and correlation estimation; questionnaire; rail lines |
| Index terms: | project uncertainty, tunnel, interview, earthwork, infrastructure construction, cost escalation, visualization, questionnaire, bias, estimation, designer, probability distribution, estimate |
| Subjects: | construction methods, financial and cost management, data collection methods, profession, infrastructure and transport systems, statistical analysis, design practice, economics, civil engineering, probability and distributions, project management theory and practice |
| Topics: | Design Practice, Roles and Professions, Research Practice, Project Management, Engineering Principles, Cost Management |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here