Orabi, W and El-Rayes, K (2012) Optimizing the rehabilitation efforts of aging transportation networks. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 138(4), pp. 529-539. ISSN 0733-9364
Abstract
Major roads and bridges in the United States are aging and deteriorating, which is causing significant human and economic losses. The required investments to rehabilitate these transportation networks exceed available funds and budgets. The rehabilitation efforts of these aging networks, therefore, need to be optimized to maximize their net benefits and reduce the effect of construction works on the traveling public. This paper presents the development of an innovative model aimed at aiding decision makers in planning and optimizing highway rehabilitation programs. This model provides new and unique capabilities, which include: allocating limited financial resources to competing highway rehabilitation projects, measuring the effect of rehabilitation efforts on network performance and road user savings, analyzing the expected benefits and costs of rehabilitation programs, and generating optimal tradeoffs between maximizing rehabilitation benefits and minimizing network service disruption using a genetic algorithm (GA)-based optimization module. An application example is analyzed to evaluate the performance of the proposed model and demonstrate its capabilities in identifying a wide range of optimal rehabilitation programs, in which each provides a unique and nondominated tradeoff between maximizing rehabilitation benefits and minimizing service disruption. This allows decision makers in departments of transportation to select and implement the rehabilitation programs that address their specific societal needs.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | benefit-cost analysis; optimization; planning; rehabilitation; resource allocation; transportation networks |
| Index terms: | program, rehabilitation project, genetic algorithm, United States, cost analysis, tradeoff, module, construction work, resource allocation, savings |
| Subjects: | economic analysis, resource management, financial and cost management, operations management, Geography, architectural elements, algorithms, software systems, decision analysis, health conditions and diseases |
| Topics: | Geographical Context, Project Management, Health and Safety, Business Strategy, Cost Management, Risk Management, Digital Applications, Design Practice, Site Management |
| Descriptive scope: | 2 PC |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here