Praticò, F G; Antonio, C and Domenico, T (2012) Influence of dispersion and location on pay adjustment in construction engineering. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 138(10), pp. 1125-1130. ISSN 0733-9364
Abstract
Acceptance procedures are usually defined in terms of the fraction of elements that fall outside certain specification limits, such as the data dispersion around a central tendency. In contrast, design methods usually consider measures of a central tendency or location (i.e., mean) or, occasionally, of a central tendency together with measures of data dispersion. Price adjustments can be derived from data analysis using empirical models or algorithms based on life cycle cost analysis. As a consequence, there is no common logical framework for designing, analyzing, testing, and accepting road and airport pavements. This study analyzes the dependence of pay adjustment on hot mix asphalt air void characteristics using several acceptance procedures. The results demonstrate that the transition from location-based to dispersion-based systems depends on the probability density function describing a given quality characteristic. The drawbacks of several methods, brought to light in the analysis and discussion presented here, informed a new model in which both location and dispersion indicators are considered. The model was applied to a case study, and practical applications are outlined.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | air voids; life cycle; pavement; payment; probability distribution; quality control |
| Index terms: | specification, data analysis, density, case study, life cycle, life cycle cost analysis, probability distribution, construction engineering, quality control, testing, design method |
| Subjects: | contractual condition, economics, engineering methods, statistical analysis, value management, design methods, data collection methods, analytical methods, project delivery, data analysis and analytics, professional practice |
| Topics: | Research Practice, Project Management, Engineering Principles, Cost Management, Quality Management, Design Practice, Urban Studies, Contract Administration |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here