San Cristóbal, J R (2012) Contractor selection using multicriteria decision-making methods. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 138(6), pp. 751-758. ISSN 0733-9364
Abstract
Contractors play a vital role in the overall performance of a project. Selecting the right contractor for the right project is the most crucial challenge for any construction client. Numerous and often conflicting objectives and alternatives, such as tender price, completion date, and experience, need to be considered. Recently, to assist owners in making decisions, there has been a trend away from a lowest-price wins principle and subjective judgement to a multicriteria selection approach in the selection of contractors for construction projects. In the autonomous region of Cantabria, in the north of Spain, increased project complexity and higher requirements have recently demanded the use of multicriteria decision-making methods for contractor selection. With this aim, two multicriteria decision methods, the technique for order preference by similarity to ideal solution (TOPSIS) and vlsekriterijumska optimizacija I kompromisno resenje (VIKOR) methods, are applied to the selection of a contractor for the road building project La Braguía undertaken during 2002. The results show that one of the contractors is the highest ranked by both methods. Being the highest ranked alternative by the TOPSIS method indicates that this contractor is the best in terms of the ranking index. In addition, being the highest ranked alternative by the VIKOR method indicates that it is the closest to the ideal solution.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | construction management; contractor selection; multicriteria methods |
| Index terms: | owner, topsis, Spain, construction client, contractor selection, preference, project complexity, decision-making, construction project, tender price |
| Subjects: | sociology, decision analysis, decision-making and optimization, tendering, decision-making and reasoning, organizational theory, Geography, production management, practitioner |
| Topics: | Risk Management, Roles and Professions, Stakeholder Management, Procurement, Research Practice, Project Management, Geographical Context |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PCT |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here