Tatari, O and Kucukvar, M (2012) Sustainability assessment of U.S. Construction sectors: Ecosystems perspective. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 138(8), pp. 918-922. ISSN 0733-9364
Abstract
The U.S. construction industry accounts for approximately 4% of the gross domestic product. Although quantifying and analyzing the cumulative ecological resource consumption of the construction industry is of great importance, it has not been studied sufficiently. This paper aims to account for the total ecological resource consumption of the construction industry, including its supply chains. This analysis is achieved by using an ecologically based life-cycle assessment model. The impacts on the ecosystem were calculated on the basis of the economic data in terms of cumulative mass, energy, industrial exergy, and ecological exergy. U.S. construction sectors are holistically evaluated by using various sustainability metrics, such as resource intensity, efficiency ratio, and loading ratio. Total ecological exergy values were generally found to be larger for the sectors with higher economic output values. Heavy construction industry sectors, including construction and maintenance of highways, bridges, or pipelines, were generally found to use fewer renewable resources and to have higher emission intensity.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | environmental issues; sustainable development; system analysis |
| Index terms: | industry sector, renewable resources, environmental issue, sustainability assessment, sustainable development, construction sector, gross domestic product, efficiency, pipeline, heavy construction, construction industry, resource consumption, loading |
| Subjects: | sustainability assessment, performance management, health safety and environment, industry analysis, infrastructure and transport systems, environmental issues, environmental resource management, construction operations, economic analysis |
| Topics: | Quality Management, Site Management, Research Practice, Engineering Principles, Business Strategy, Health and Safety, Sustainability |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCTA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here