Too, E G (2012) A capability model to improve infrastructure asset performance. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 138(7), ISSN 0733-9364
Abstract
Infrastructure organizations are operating in an increasingly challenging business environment as a result of globalization, privatization and deregulation. In an external business environment that is constantly changing, extant literature on strategic management advocates the need to focus on factors internal to the organization such as resources and capabilities to sustain their performance. Specifically, they need to develop dynamic capabilities in order to survive and prosper under conditions of change. The aim of this paper is to explore the dynamic capabilities needed in the management of transport infrastructure assets using a multiple case study research strategy. This paper produced a number of findings. First, the empirical evidence showed that the core infrastructure asset management processes are capacity management, options evaluation, procurement & delivery, maintenance management, and asset information management. Second, the study identified five dynamic capabilities namely stakeholder connectivity, crossfunctional, relational, technology absorptive and integrated information capability as central to executing the strategic infrastructure asset management processes well. These findings culminate in the development of a capability model to improve the performance of infrastructure assets in an increasingly dynamic business environment.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | dynamic capabilities; infrastructure assets; management; strategic |
| Index terms: | evidence, globalization, option, asset information management, strategic management, dynamic capability, case study, infrastructure asset management, transport infrastructure, strategy, maintenance management, deregulation, privatization, connectivity |
| Subjects: | infrastructure and transport systems, asset management, regulatory law, management, economic analysis, networking, economic factors, maintenance engineering, evaluation and assessment methods, data collection methods, decision analysis |
| Topics: | Digital Applications, Risk Management, Research Practice, Engineering Principles, International Construction, Business Strategy, Legal Issues |
| Descriptive scope: | 5 PCTEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here