Townsend, K; Lingard, H; Bradley, L and Brown, K (2012) Complicated working time arrangements: Construction industry case study. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 138(3), pp. 443-448. ISSN 0733-9364
Abstract
This paper extends the understanding of working-time changes and work-life balance (WLB) through analyzing a case study where a reduction in working hours designed to assist the workforce in balancing work and nonwork life was implemented. An alliance project in the Australian construction industry was established initially with a 5-day working week, a departure from the industry-standard 6-day week. However, a range of factors complicated the success of this initiative, and the industry-standard 6-day working week was reinstated for the project. The authors argue that this case is valuable in determining the complex mix of influences that work against a wholesale or straightforward adoption of working-time adjustments and work-life balance practices. It is concluded that although the prevailing workplace culture is considered an important factor in the determination of working time, structural and workplace principles and practices may also be critical in working to secure the successful introduction of working-time reduction and work-life balance initiatives in the construction industry in the future.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | Australia; case studies; case study; time factors; work time; work-life balance; working conditions |
| Index terms: | time reduction, working hours, case study, Australia, working conditions, construction industry, work-life balance |
| Subjects: | industry analysis, management, employment law, Geography, data collection methods |
| Topics: | Legal Issues, Human Resources, Business Strategy, Geographical Context, Research Practice |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCTE |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here