Wambeke, B W; Liu, M and Hsiang, S M (2012) Using last planner and a risk assessment matrix to reduce variation in mechanical related construction tasks. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 138(4), pp. 491-498. ISSN 0733-9364
Abstract
Variation, defined for this research as the time difference between what was planned and what actually happened, is important as it can affect the productivity performance of construction tasks. The construction process is complex and consists of a large number of interdependent tasks. When the starting time and/or duration of one task varies, it can affect other downstream tasks and result in disruptions to the schedule and/or decreased productivity. This research examined the effect of using a risk assessment matrix in conjunction with the Last Planner System (LPS) method to reduce and/or eliminate task duration variation. A case study was conducted involving a mechanical contractor who specializes in plumbing, heating, ventilation, and air conditioning. The company compared the performance of two separate, but similar projects. The LPS method was used with one of the projects and the company's traditional planning system was used with the other (i.e., not using the LPS system). A total of 16weeks' worth of data was collected for each project. Variation, productivity, and cost savings were analyzed using a risk assessment matrix and benefit-cost procedures. The project that used the LPS method had a 35% higher productivity performance than the traditionally planned project and resulted in a benefit-cost ratio of 131. The research findings fill a gap in the body of knowledge by analyzing how planning can reduce variation with real project data. The results of this research illustrate the effect the LPS method can have on reducing variation and improving project productivity performance. The findings also serve as an example of an effective planning strategy for project managers and field managers in their efforts to improve project performance.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | construction; labor productivity; last planner; risk; variation |
| Index terms: | productivity, project manager, case study, plumbing, duration, cost saving, risk assessment, labour productivity, planner, project performance, strategy, project data, ventilation, manager, body of knowledge, air conditioning, construction process, variation, last planner system |
| Subjects: | contractual condition, financial risk, project management theory and practice, management, economics, environmental engineering, project controls, building construction, practitioner, data collection methods, profession, air quality, mechanical systems, knowledge management |
| Topics: | Sustainability, Roles and Professions, Information Management, Engineering Principles, Project Management, Research Practice, Cost Management, Business Strategy, Site Management, Contract Administration, Time Control, Design Practice |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here