Using Pajek and centrality analysis to identify a social network of construction trades

Wambeke, B W; Liu, M and Hsiang, S M (2012) Using Pajek and centrality analysis to identify a social network of construction trades. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 138(10), pp. 1192-1201. ISSN 0733-9364

Abstract

Construction project managers are often faced with the challenge of managing a complex construction process consisting of multiple trades working on a large number of interdependent tasks. A social network is a pattern of ties that exist between different entities (i.e., people, organizations, countries). There is an underlying social network of trades that exists with a construction project and recognizing it can help a management team succeed in this challenging environment. A $50 million project involving 43 trades was studied over a 28-week period. Pajek, a social network analysis program, was used to generate a series of 14 social networks for the trades involved. Both degree and eigenvector centrality were analyzed to reflect the distribution of relationships through the network and to identify the key trades. This research is useful to project managers and is significant as it outlines and illustrates a method of identifying the underlying network and associated key trades of a construction project based on spatial proximity. While this research is based upon an individual case study, the apsects of this research are repeatable. The methods presented in this paper will enable others to develop a social network that is tailored for a specific aspect of a project, ranging from contract development teams to the individual trades using a critical path method (CPM) schedule.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: construction; degree centrality; eigenvector centrality; pajek; social network
Index terms: critical path method, construction process, program, construction project, social network analysis, social network, manager, project manager, case study, eigenvector
Subjects: production management, research methods, software systems, building construction, sociology, measurement and scaling, practitioner, data collection methods, profession, operations research
Topics: Digital Applications, Site Management, Time Control, Project Management, Research Practice, Roles and Professions
Descriptive scope: 5 PCTEA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here