Zerjav, V; Hartmann, T and Javemick-Will, A (2012) Internal governance of design and engineering: The case of the multinational firm. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 138(1), pp. 135-143. ISSN 0733-9364
Abstract
This paper examines the process of design and engineering in large-scale construction projects delivered by multinational organizations. The analysis is on the basis of using transaction cost economics to represent design and engineering as a stream of intrafirm transactions between the local contracting office and the network of subsidiary offices. The paper then applies the concept of asset specificity to process-level design and engineering knowledge and induces a theoretical framework on the basis of local and expertise specificity of assets. The framework posits that different levels of local and expertise specificity lead to different modes for intra-firm governance of work packages in design and engineering. The paper validates the theoretical framework with interview data from six major international design and engineering organizations and derives a set of management recommendations for practitioners. The framework takes the transaction cost theory into the realm of intra-firm governance represented as a stream of asset-specific transactions. The framework extends construction engineering and management literature with a transaction-based elaboration of the design and engineering process.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | asset specificity; case reports; interdisciplinary design and engineering; internal governance; transaction costs |
| Index terms: | transaction cost, governance, package, practitioner, asset specificity, stream, interview, construction engineering, construction project |
| Subjects: | practitioner, data collection methods, water management, business, financial analysis, contractual arrangements, economic concepts, production management, engineering methods |
| Topics: | Cost Management, Engineering Principles, Procurement, Research Practice, Roles and Professions, Project Management, Sustainability, Governance |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCTE |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here