Zhang, D; Haas, C T; Goodrum, P M; Caldas, C H and Granger, R (2012) Construction small-projects rework reduction for capital facilities. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 138(12), pp. 1377-1385. ISSN 0733-9364
Abstract
Rework is a persistent problem in construction. Reducing field rework is widely regarded as an effective way of improving construction performance in terms of productivity, cost, and schedule. Although much literature exists concerning rework reduction, there is a need for further analysis, validation, and improvement of rework reduction methods. This paper presents a generalized model for a rework reduction program (RRP), which is intended to reduce rework by managing a continuous improvement loop with four functional processes: (1) rework tracking and cause classification, (2) evaluation of rework and its causes, (3) corrective action planning, and (4) integration of changes into the total management system. Analysis is conducted to examine and verify the functional mechanisms and effectiveness of the generalized model, by investigating a rework reduction program implemented in practice for a series of dozens of small projects executed by three contractors that represents the generalized model, and by analyzing the impact trends on rework in terms of frequency, cost, and labor hours over a considerable time period. The paper's primary contribution to the overall body of knowledge is that it provides statistical evidence that the occurrence and impact of rework can be reduced significantly with such a program.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | continuous improvement; field rework; productivity; root causes; statistical analysis |
| Index terms: | management system, rework, evidence, validation, program, integration, body of knowledge, statistical analysis, construction performance, productivity, continuous improvement, effectiveness, small project |
| Subjects: | organizational analysis, management, performance measurement, software systems, performance management, production management, professional development, operations management, performance assessment, data science, knowledge management, evaluation and assessment methods |
| Topics: | Research Practice, Project Management, Information Management, Business Strategy, Site Management, Organizational Design, Quality Management, Digital Applications |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PCA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here