Zhang, L and Qi, J (2012) Controlling path and controlling segment analysis in repetitive scheduling method. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 138(11), pp. 1341-1345. ISSN 0733-9364
Abstract
The controlling path and controlling segment are the basis for repetitive project scheduling. In this paper the controlling path is defined as the longest path in duration that determines the minimum project duration, including the controlling segments and controlling constraints on it. The controlling segments are defined as the subactivities on the controlling path. A method to identify the controlling path and controlling segments is proposed, on the basis of the technology of identifying the potential controlling points. To investigate how the project duration is determined, three types of controlling segments are defined and analyzed, namely, the forward controlling segment, the point controlling segment, and the backward controlling segment. This paper presents a convenient and correct way to identify the controlling path and controlling segments conforming to the constraints of projects.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | constraint; controlling path; controlling segment; project management; repetitive; scheduling |
| Index terms: | duration, project management, repetitive scheduling, repetitive project, scheduling |
| Subjects: | project controls, project management theory and practice, operations research, production management |
| Topics: | Time Control, Project Management |
| Descriptive scope: | 2 PC |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here