Al-Bataineh, M; Abourizk, S and Parkis, H (2013) Using simulation to plan tunnel construction. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 139(5), pp. 564-571. ISSN 0733-9364
Abstract
Tunneling's linearity causes planning complications: at any point, the actions that can be taken are determined by previous accomplishments. These constraints mean that tunneling projects require careful preparation for success. Current planning tools do not address the breadth and scope of the variables affecting tunneling and are not easily updatable. This paper contributes a real-world case study of the practical use of scenario-based simulation analysis for project planning and decision support in a CA$22 million utility tunneling project in Edmonton, Alberta, Canada. An integrated simulation-based solution for tunnel planning and decision support was created by using modular development and a high level architecture (HLA)-inspired communications framework. This is a demonstration of a generic yet flexible project modeling approach that may be of interest to both practitioners and researchers; it incorporates the modeling powers of simulation, appeals to a practicing tunneling engineer, and facilitates rapid scenario-based planning with swift development. The simulation was built in Simphony.NET and used to explore planning alternatives and for decision support during the project execution.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | high level architecture; planning; production; simphony.net; simulation; utility tunneling |
| Index terms: | practitioner, project planning, simulation analysis, decision support, tunnel, modelling, case study, tunnel construction, Canada, engineer |
| Subjects: | infrastructure and transport systems, decision analysis, Geography, civil engineering, analytical methods, design analysis, control systems, practitioner, profession, data collection methods |
| Topics: | Geographical Context, Project Management, Research Practice, Engineering Principles, Roles and Professions, Risk Management, Design Practice |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here