Analysis of causes of construction defects using fault trees and risk importance measures

Aljassmi, H and Han, S (2013) Analysis of causes of construction defects using fault trees and risk importance measures. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 139(7), pp. 870-880. ISSN 0733-9364

Abstract

Defects can have a significant impact on construction performance. A defect is not usually an outcome of a single cause, but rather occurs when multiple interrelated causes combine, forming a defect's pathway. Because defects may occur through numerous pathways, the risks of causes can vary in terms of the number (i.e., frequency) of pathways that they take part in and the impact (i.e., magnitude) of the contribution they provide for the formation of these pathways. Several studies have strived to identify generic defect causes; however, research on the analysis of the risk of causes in order to develop further defect management efforts is lacking. To address this deficiency, this study aims to develop a methodology to identify and quantify the risk of defect pathways. Specifically, the study uses a fault-tree approach to construct the taxonomy of the defect causes and uses risk importance measures to assess the identified defect causes in terms of frequency and magnitude. Applying the developed methodology to four residential projects in Dubai confirmed its applicability as an effective tool for analyzing the risk of defect causes in construction. An effective defect-prevention strategy is expected to be further developed by applying the methodology to a large number of defect samples in a subsequent study. This paper makes a contribution to knowledge in the area of construction engineering and management by introducing a quantitative model, which opens a gateway for researchers to address the complex nature of defect generation and to better understand the vulnerability of a construction project system to defects. In addition, this paper is of value to practitioners with respect to providing an effective tool to rank the significance of defect causes and to optimize their resources consumed for defect prevention.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: defect; error; fault tree; risk; risk importance measure
Index terms: Dubai, strategy, defect management, practitioner, vulnerability, residential project, methodology, construction project, construction performance, construction defect, taxonomy, prevention, construction engineering
Subjects: performance assessment, contract obligations, data analysis and analytics, practitioner, environmental hazards, quality assurance, production management, Geography, financial risk, economic development, management, engineering methods, research methods
Topics: Engineering Principles, Research Practice, Project Management, Geographical Context, Business Strategy, Cost Management, Sustainability, Roles and Professions, Quality Management, Urban Studies, Legal Issues, Site Management
Descriptive scope: 4 PCTA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here