Fuzzy-based life-cycle cost model for decision making under subjectivity

Ammar, M; Zayed, T and Moselhi, O (2013) Fuzzy-based life-cycle cost model for decision making under subjectivity. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 139(5), pp. 556-563. ISSN 0733-9364

Abstract

Decision support models are needed to facilitate long-term planning and priority setting among competing alternatives. Life-cycle cost is the most frequently used economic model that considers all cost elements and related factors throughout the service life of the alternatives being considered. These cost elements and related factors are usually associated with uncertainty and subjectivity. As such, it is important to model the uncertainty arising from the assumed data over the service life of competing alternatives. Probabilistic techniques, such as Monte Carlo simulation, are commonly used to deal with such uncertainty or vagueness. However, they have been criticized for their complexity and amount of data required. This paper presents a fuzzy-based life-cycle cost model that accounts for uncertainty in a manner that disadvantages commonly encountered in probabilistic models are alleviated. The developed model utilized fuzzy set theory and interval mathematics to model vague, imprecise, qualitative, linguistic, and/or incomplete data. The model incorporates the equivalent annual cost method along with the Day-Stout-Warren (DSW) algorithm and the vertex method to evaluate competing alternatives. An example application is presented in order to demonstrate the use of the developed model and to illustrate its essential features.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: decision making; fuzzy set theory; life-cycle cost; ranking of alternatives; subjectivity; uncertainty
Index terms: service life, subjectivity, fuzzy set theory, economic model, decision support, complexity, decision-making, Monte Carlo simulation, cost model
Subjects: decision analysis, modelling and simulation, human factors and perception, financial and cost management, asset management, decision-making and optimization, systems engineering
Topics: Engineering Principles, Research Practice, Risk Management, Business Strategy, Cost Management
Descriptive scope: 4 PCTA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here