Project cell: Cellular organization of the building design process

Aquere, A L; Dinis-Carvalho, J and Lima, R M (2013) Project cell: Cellular organization of the building design process. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 139(5), pp. 538-546. ISSN 0733-9364

Abstract

The construction sector plays an important role in most economies; therefore, any waste reduction in a building's life cycle will result in a significant benefit to the economy. It is at the building design phase that most costs and wastes are defined for the entire building life cycle. Moreover, many forms of waste are also accumulated during the design phase itself. This article presents a new approach for organizing and managing the building design phase in a more effective and efficient way. This approach, called project cell, promotes concurrent engineering and lean management principles to achieve better performance during the design of a building. The project cell approach was implemented in the design process of a generic kindergarten project for the Brazilian Ministry of Education. In this case study, the implementation of project cell resulted in better productivity in the building design process as well as more effective building designs when compared with the traditional departmentalized approaches. The authors believe that introducing project cell may be valuable contribution to the Construction Engineering Management (CEM) body of knowledge.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: building design process; lean management; production cells; project cell; project management
Index terms: case study, building design, productivity, life cycle, building life cycle, design phase, concurrent engineering, project management, implementation, design process, construction engineering management, waste reduction, body of knowledge, construction sector
Subjects: data collection methods, value management, design methods, knowledge management, contractual arrangements, professional practice, architectural design, sustainability assessment, management, engineering methods, project management theory and practice, asset management, industry analysis
Topics: Business Strategy, Information Management, Engineering Principles, Research Practice, Project Management, Sustainability, Procurement, Design Practice
Descriptive scope: 4 PCTE

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here