Adaptive learning of contractor default prediction model for surety bonding

Awad, A and Fayek, A R (2013) Adaptive learning of contractor default prediction model for surety bonding. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 139(6), pp. 694-704. ISSN 0733-9364

Abstract

The performance of a fuzzy expert system (FES) is significantly affected by the accuracy of its knowledge base parameters (membership functions and rule bases). The main contribution of this paper is in presenting a methodology to integrate an FES with adaptation/optimization techniques and applying the data-based adaptive learning concept to increase the accuracy of an FES developed for contractor default prediction for surety bonding. In addition, this paper investigates two optimization approaches (genetic algorithms and neural network back-propagation) for adaptation of fuzzy membership function (MBF) and rules' degree of support (DoS) to determine the most suitable technique to adapt the FES. The optimized FES, called SuretyQualification, was validated using 30 hypothetical contractor default prediction cases, and the highest accuracy of the system (adapted using neural networks) was found to be 91.83%. Another contribution of this paper is the development of a software tool called SuretyQualification that provides a comprehensive and systematic evaluation process to evaluate a contractor and their risk of default on a project. The presented optimization approaches address FES context adaptation using any changing information conveyed by the input-output data and provide a methodology for continuous adaptation of the FES parameters, using practical cases to adjust the FES according to any contexts changes.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: adaptive systems; bonding; fuzzy sets; neural networks
Index terms: adaptation, fuzzy set, adaptive system, optimization technique, propagation, accuracy, prediction model, surety, neural network, genetic algorithm, default, knowledge base, expert system, methodology
Subjects: data management, information systems, decision-making and optimization, research methods, algorithms, theoretical framing, professional development, warranties, prediction and forecasting, artificial intelligence, user focus, engineering process, dispute resolution
Topics: Contract Administration, Digital Applications, Design Practice, Legal Issues, Information Management, Engineering Principles, Research Practice
Descriptive scope: 4 PCTA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here