Chou, J S; Irawan, N and Pham, A D (2013) Project management knowledge of construction professionals: Cross-country study of effects on project success. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 139(11): 4013015, ISSN 0733-9364
Abstract
This multinational study of the contribution of the Project Management Body of Knowledge (PMBOK) to the success of construction engineering projects was performed to reveal cross-country similarities and differences. A survey questionnaire of professional engineers in the construction industry (project managers, stakeholders, and team members) was performed in Taiwan, Indonesia, and Vietnam. Structural equation modeling was used to determine the effects of PMBOK techniques/tools/skills (TTSs) on project success (PS). The contributions to the PMBOK include (1) a novel PS index (PSI) framework adapted from the American Customer Satisfaction Index and an importance-performance analysis (IPA) for prioritizing PMBOK TTS predictors of PS, (2) an IPA technique for identifying PMBOK TTS items that help construction practitioners improve PS by implementing effective managerial strategies, enhancing project performance, and improving the efficient use of management resources, and (3) guidance in the current use of PMBOK TTSs by practitioners and educators in the construction engineering field. Empirical data obtained in a cross-country comparison confirm that effective use of PMBOK TTSs substantially increases the probability of PS. Moreover, construction practitioners can develop management knowledge needed to increase the likelihood of PS based on TTS that this study identified as essential for project performance.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | cross-country study; importance-performance analysis; labor and personnel issues; project management knowledge; project success; structural equation modeling; techniques/tools/ techniques |
| Index terms: | personnel, management knowledge, Taiwan, Vietnam, structural equation modelling, strategy, construction practitioner, survey, questionnaire, practitioner, body of knowledge, Indonesia, project manager, prioritizing, project success, engineer, construction engineering, performance analysis, construction professional, project performance, customer satisfaction, construction industry, project management |
| Subjects: | practitioner, profession, data collection methods, data analysis and analytics, knowledge management, Geography, service delivery, project management theory and practice, professional development, management, engineering methods, industry analysis, statistical analysis, decision analysis |
| Topics: | Project Management, Geographical Context, Research Practice, Information Management, Engineering Principles, Business Strategy, Roles and Professions, Stakeholder Management, Risk Management, Human Resources |
| Descriptive scope: | 5 PCTEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here