Quantifying the impact of facilitation on transactive memory system formation in global virtual project networks

Comu, S; Iorio, J; Taylor, J E and Dossick, C S (2013) Quantifying the impact of facilitation on transactive memory system formation in global virtual project networks. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 139(3), pp. 294-303. ISSN 0733-9364

Abstract

Building strong ties between geographically dispersed project participants is crucial to project success. In global project networks, many firms have adopted virtual collaboration tools to address the challenges imposed by temporal and geographical distance. Some researchers have examined the role of facilitators and found that process facilitation can improve collaboration. Research has also shown that facilitators can be drawn into content interactions, which may negatively impact collaboration effectiveness in virtual workspaces. Research to date has not quantified this negative impact. In this study, the formation and maintenance of transactive memory systems (TMS) in two facilitated and two nonfacilitated global virtual project networks were investigated, each executing a 2-month project. Using TMS formation and cohesive subgroup formation as a proxy for performance, quantitative evidence was found that demonstrates a negative impact on collaboration effectiveness when facilitators engage in content facilitation in virtual project networks. This paper shows that this negative impact restricts the establishment of TMSs. These findings have important implications for understanding and designing appropriate facilitator interactions in global virtual project networks.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: globalization; networks; project networks; social network analysis; transactive memory systems; virtual teams
Index terms: subgroup, workspace, facilitator, project success, virtual team, interaction, effectiveness, social network analysis, project network, collaboration, globalization, evidence
Subjects: practitioner, evaluation and assessment methods, project planning, project management theory and practice, management, research methods, performance management, information systems, behavioral psychology, economic factors, research management
Topics: Project Management, Research Practice, Stakeholder Management, Roles and Professions, International Construction, Quality Management, Digital Applications, Organizational Design
Descriptive scope: 4 PCTA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here