Damci, A; Arditi, D and Polat, G (2013) Multiresource leveling in line-of-balance scheduling. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 139(9), pp. 1108-1116. ISSN 0733-9364
Abstract
Line-of-balance (LOB) methodology produces a work schedule in which resource allocation is automatically performed to provide a continuous and uninterrupted use of resources, but the distribution of resources could be further improved by resource leveling even if multiple resources are involved. The objective of this study is to develop a genetic algorithm (GA)-based multiresource leveling model for schedules that are established by LOB. The proposed model postulates that the production rate and duration of an activity are governed by the resource that requires the longest duration in completing a unit. Once the LOB schedule is established, resource leveling is performed according to the principle of optimum crew size that makes use of a utility data curve, which shows that productivity will suffer if the crew size is different than the optimum crew size, and the principle of natural rhythm that allows shifting the start times of an activity forward or backward at different units of production by changing the number of crews employed. The duration of an activity in any one unit and the precedence relationships between activities do not change during the leveling procedure. When applied to the LOB schedule of a pipeline project that was used to illustrate the model, it was observed that the proposed multiresource leveling model provided a smoother resource utilization histogram while maintaining optimum productivity.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | cost and schedule; genetic algorithm; line-of-balance; multiresource leveling |
| Index terms: | pipeline construction, scheduling, genetic algorithm, precedence relationship, methodology, resource levelling, productivity, resource utilization, resource allocation, duration |
| Subjects: | management, civil engineering, algorithms, research methods, project controls, operations research, site logistics, resource management |
| Topics: | Research Practice, Engineering Principles, Business Strategy, Time Control, Site Management, Digital Applications |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PCT |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here