De Azevedo, R C; De Oliveira Lacerda, R T; Ensslin, L; Jungles, A E and Ensslin, S R (2013) Performance measurement to aid decision making in the budgeting process for apartment-building construction: Case study using MCDA-c. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 139(2), pp. 225-235. ISSN 0733-9364
Abstract
The construction environment has become increasingly complex and dynamic because of increased competitiveness and new technological and market practices, all of which require fast, accurate answers from decision makers. In this context, performance indicators have been used as the basis for decision support by various sectors of the construction industry. The Brazilian apartment building - construction sector is the industry sector with the highest individual contribution (on the basis of gross domestic product) to the construction process, mostly composed of small- and medium-sized businesses. In the residential-construction sector, most decisions are made in very unstructured and intuitive ways, and the initial budgeting process is one of the most critical phases because of the high level of uncertainty in a project's early stages. In addition, most methods for measuring performance on the basis of indicators have been developed without regard to the preferences and values of the persons responsible for improving the unique environment in which budgeting problems occur. Using the multicriteria decision aid-constructivist methodology (MCDA-C), a framework for budget performance evaluation for apartment-building projects was developed in which the characteristics of the context evaluated have been identified, organized, measured, and integrated according to the decision maker's values and preferences. The framework enables decision makers to understand the current situation more accurately with respect to each criterion evaluated and to the whole. This allows planning actions to improve the budget process to ensure better quality and accuracy, determine the impact of such actions on the overall assessment of the context, and prioritize actions according to goals. Performance-evaluation models built with the MCDA-C have the capacity to generate knowledge concerning the contexts decision makers intend to improve and can be used as tools to produce competitive advantages.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | apartment building; budget; decision making; multicriteria decision aid-constructivist methodology; performance evaluation; performance measurement |
| Index terms: | construction industry, competitiveness, competitive advantage, performance measurement, gross domestic product, case study, construction sector, preference, performance evaluation, decision-making, methodology, construction process, building construction, apartment building, budgeting, accuracy, performance indicator, decision support, industry sector |
| Subjects: | economic analysis, construction type, data collection methods, market analysis, decision analysis, building construction, industry analysis, performance measurement, financial management, performance management, research methods, decision-making and reasoning, professional development |
| Topics: | Site Management, Quality Management, Construction Technology, Risk Management, Research Practice, Information Management, Business Strategy |
| Descriptive scope: | 5 PCTEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here