Computing a displacement distance equivalent to optimize plans for postdisaster temporary housing projects

El-Anwar, O and Chen, L (2013) Computing a displacement distance equivalent to optimize plans for postdisaster temporary housing projects. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 139(2), pp. 174-184. ISSN 0733-9364

Abstract

Residence in temporary housing is a critical period for the social, economic, and psychological recovery of displaced families following disasters. Temporary housing locations define the displacement distance between families and their essential needs. The objective of this paper is to develop a novel methodology to capture the specific proximity needs and preferences of displaced families. This paper proposes a displacement distance equivalent as an objective metric to evaluate the performance of temporary housing locations in meeting the needs of displaced families. Moreover, the paper describes the development of an integer programming optimization model capable of optimizing temporary housing assignments to minimize total displacement distance equivalent while meeting budget constraints. The main contribution of this paper to the body of knowledge is in transforming the purpose of temporary housing programs from offering general accommodation to providing customized housing solutions tailored to the individual proximity needs of each household using the proposed displacement metric. In addition, the proposed optimization model enables decision makers to set budget constraints to ensure the economic feasibility of identified temporary housing solutions.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: disaster recovery; displacement distance; housing sites; optimization; temporary housing
Index terms: body of knowledge, preference, temporary housing, housing, methodology, program, computing, disaster recovery, integer programming, household, budget constraint, recovery
Subjects: financial and cost management, knowledge management, operations management, specific urban areas and projects, computing systems, construction type, emergency and crisis management, demography, research methods, decision-making and reasoning, algorithms, software systems
Topics: Urban Studies, Digital Applications, Sustainability, Construction Technology, Cost Management, Information Management, Research Practice, Project Management
Descriptive scope: 3 PCT

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here