Survey of motivations, benefits, and implementation challenges of last planner system users

Fernandez-Solis, J L; Porwal, V; Lavy, S; Shafaat, A; Rybkowski, Z K; Son, K and Lagoo, N (2013) Survey of motivations, benefits, and implementation challenges of last planner system users. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 139(4), pp. 354-360. ISSN 0733-9364

Abstract

The number of construction project managers initializing the use of the Last Planner System of Production Control (LPS), an operating system for project management designed to optimize work flow and promote rapid learning, is rapidly increasing, motivated by industry trends and testimonials of its perceived benefits. This study, limited to the building sector, is a systematic literature and testimonial search of the perceived motivations and benefits or challenges for choosing LPS. It substantiates the claims of those perceptions through a structured survey of senior and mid-level managers. Quantitative statistical tools infer that practitioners who use LPS experience more reliable planning, better supply chain integration, and less work flow time. However, managers who directly implement LPS are faced with external resistance from clients and subcontractors, and feel that their organization does not offer the necessary incentives for adopting LPS, indicating a possible clash of paradigms. The case studies and testimonials were available in the literature referenced in the paper, but the survey and the method for analysis are new and have not been published elsewhere, either wholly or in part.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: daily huddle meetings; five whys; last planner system; percent plan complete; reasons charting and constraint analysis; six sigma
Index terms: manager, six sigma, motivation, survey, practitioner, construction project, last planner system, subcontractor, case study, production control, paradigm, project management, supply chain integration, percent plan complete, implementation
Subjects: production management, project management theory and practice, education and knowledge transfer, performance measurement, project controls, practitioner, data collection methods, supply chain integration, contractual arrangements, project delivery, psychology
Topics: Project Management, Research Practice, Procurement, Roles and Professions, Supply Chain Management, Human Resources, Quality Management, Time Control
Descriptive scope: 4 PCTE

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here