Franz, B W; Leicht, R M and Riley, D R (2013) Project impacts of specialty mechanical contractor design involvement in the health care industry: Comparative case study. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 139(9), pp. 1091-1097. ISSN 0733-9364
Abstract
Recent research efforts on project delivery have been heavily focused on using project-level indicators to predict cost and schedule outcomes. However, specialty contractors performing at the system level have an increasingly important role in the design and construction of healthcare and other high-performance facilities. From curtain wall assemblies to HVAC systems, specialty contractors possess the system knowledge and field expertise to support delivery of energy-efficient, cost-effective systems. Therefore, this research adapted the use of existing metrics from broader, project-level applications to a narrower building system, focused to contextualize the importance of system delivery. A comparative case study analysis was conducted to collect quantitative data on schedule and cost outcomes, construction safety, and building energy performance on two large healthcare facilities. By comparing a design-build and design-assist case, this paper demonstrates how increasing design involvement of mechanical contractors provides opportunities to reduce cost growth, schedule growth, and safety incidents, and improve the HVAC system performance in healthcare projects. Contextual lessons from the design-build case are discussed and suggested for application in other forms of project delivery.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | collaboration; contracting; design-build; mechanical contractor; project delivery; specialty contractor |
| Index terms: | collaboration, construction safety, building system, design and construction, schedule growth, health care, energy performance, curtain wall, project delivery, case study, specialty contractor |
| Subjects: | project delivery, energy systems, contractual arrangements, professional practice, data collection methods, engineering systems, project controls, environmental health, public and environmental health, management, building systems |
| Topics: | Organizational Design, Time Control, Design Practice, Sustainability, Procurement, Engineering Principles, Research Practice, Health and Safety |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PCE |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here