Gangolells, M; Casals, M; Forcada, N; Fuertes, A and Roca, X (2013) Model for enhancing integrated identification, assessment, and operational control of on-site environmental impacts and health and safety risks in construction firms. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 139(2), pp. 138-147. ISSN 0733-9364
Abstract
Certifiable management-system standards apply similar management techniques and principles, but each system still tends to have a separate structure in construction companies. Research and practice have demonstrated that management tasks may be duplicated when standards are implemented in parallel. Consequently, integrated management systems are strongly advocated. However, existing literature demonstrates that the integration of planning and control instruments involves a high level of uncertainty. This paper presents an innovative model to enhance the integration of environmental- and health and safety-management systems in construction companies, focusing on the subsystems for identifying, assessing, and operationally controlling environmental aspects and health and safety hazards and using risk as an integrating factor. The findings of this study have direct implications for both designers and contractors because the model helps to explicitly consider on-site environmental impacts and construction-worker safety during the design process and offers on-site guidance to eliminate the remaining impacts and risks or reduce them to acceptable levels. A case study is reported to illustrate the practical use of the proposed model and its benefits.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | construction process; environmental management; health and safety management; integrated management systems |
| Index terms: | management system, design process, health and safety, construction firm, construction company, environmental impact, construction process, integration, case study, designer, environmental management, health and safety management |
| Subjects: | data collection methods, profession, organization, environmental impact, design methods, organizational analysis, building construction, sustainability assessment, management, health safety and environment |
| Topics: | Research Practice, Health and Safety, Business Strategy, Sustainability, Roles and Professions, Design Practice, Site Management, Organizational Design |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PCE |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here