Jin, Z; Deng, F; Li, H and Skitmore, M (2013) Practical framework for measuring performance of international construction firms. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 139(9), pp. 1154-1167. ISSN 0733-9364
Abstract
The internationalization of construction companies has become of significant interest as the global construction market continues to be integrated into a more competitive and turbulent business environment. However, due to the complicated and multifaceted nature of international business and performance, there is as yet no consensus on how to evaluate the performance of international construction firms (ICFs). The purpose of this paper, therefore, is to develop a practical framework for measuring the performance of ICFs. Based on the balanced scorecard (BSC), a framework with detailed measures is developed, investigated, and tested using a three-step research design. In the first step, 27 measures under six dimensions (financial, market, customer, internal business processes, stakeholders, and learning and growth) are determined by literature review, interviews with academics, and seminar discussions. Subsequently, a questionnaire survey is conducted to investigate weights of these 27 performance measures. The questionnaire survey also supports the importance of measuring intangible aspects of international construction performance from the practitioner's viewpoint. Additionally, a case study is described to test the framework's robustness and usefulness. This is achieved by benchmarking the performance of a Chinese ICF with nine other counterparts worldwide. It is found that the framework provides an effective basis for benchmarking ICFs to effectively monitor their performance and support the development of strategies for improved competitiveness in the international arena. This paper is the first attempt to present a balanced and practically tested framework for evaluating the performance of ICFs. It contributes to the practice of performance measurement and related internationalization in the construction industry in general.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | balanced scorecard; benchmarking; construction firm; international construction; internationalization; organizational issues; performance measurement |
| Index terms: | international business, balanced scorecard, performance measurement, case study, research design, internationalization, global construction, international construction, competitiveness, dimension, construction industry, organizational issue, interview, literature review, strategy, performance measure, construction firm, construction company, survey, questionnaire, practitioner, benchmarking |
| Subjects: | business, research design and methodology, organization, data collection methods, strategic management, practitioner, health monitoring assessment and metrics, economic analysis, data analysis and analytics, management, performance measurement, market analysis, industry analysis |
| Topics: | Roles and Professions, Research Practice, Business Strategy, Health and Safety, Organizational Design, Quality Management, International Construction |
| Descriptive scope: | 5 PCTEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here