Lee, N and Rojas, E M (2013) Visual representations for monitoring project performance: Developing novel prototypes for improved communication. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 139(8), pp. 994-1005. ISSN 0733-9364
Abstract
Maintaining project control demands construction project managers navigate the discrepancies between target and actual performance - a specific challenge for large-scale construction projects that generate large amounts of ever-changing data. Project managers often use visual representations of data to make better-informed decisions; however, current approaches often fail to manifest the multifaceted considerations that render a successful project. Better visual representation tools would streamline communication and improve project efficiency. Applying a variety of research methods ranging from literature reviews to simulation and usability tests, this investigation's six-step process developed four alternative visual representations prototypes for improved performance monitoring: Activity Icons, Map of Activities, Activity Wall, and Activity Gazer. This paper contributes to the body of knowledge by iteratively designing these four prototype visual representations in consultation with experienced project managers and by assessing industry's receptivity. This paper also lays the foundation for long-term expansion of research into the most successful of the developed visual representation prototypes: Activity Gazer.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | models; monitoring; multimedia; project management |
| Index terms: | body of knowledge, construction project, performance monitoring, literature review, prototype, usability, manager, project control, project management, project performance, investigation, monitoring, project manager, efficiency |
| Subjects: | monitoring and control systems, performance management, production management, project management theory and practice, data collection methods, profession, user-centered design, practitioner, control systems, modelling and simulation, data analysis and analytics, knowledge management |
| Topics: | Project Management, Research Practice, Information Management, Engineering Principles, Roles and Professions, Governance, Design Practice, Quality Management, Site Management |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PCA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here