Automated method for checking crane paths for heavy lifts in industrial projects

Lei, Z; Taghaddos, H; Olearczyk, J; Al-Hussein, M and Hermann, U (2013) Automated method for checking crane paths for heavy lifts in industrial projects. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 139(10): 04013011, ISSN 0733-9364

Abstract

At present, industrial projects are constructed primarily using a prefabricated approach. The modules are produced in an off-site facility and transported on transport trailers to the construction site where they are lifted by mobile cranes. One of the keys to the success of modular industrial projects is efficient crane planning, which includes path checking to find whether or not a crane has a feasible path through which to lift a module over obstructions in a congested plant. However, due to the large number of lifts, the manual path-checking practice is quite tedious and prone to error. In light of this problem, this paper proposes a methodology for automatically checking the lift paths for industrial projects. The proposed methodology simplifies and represents the three-dimensional site layout using project elevations. For each elevation, the crane feasible operation range (CFOR) is calculated based on the crane's capacity and clearances, as well as site constraints. The pick area (PA) is calculated by subtracting the ground obstruction areas from the CFOR. The relative positions of the module's set point, the CFOR, and the PA are checked to determine the feasibility of the lift path on each elevation, as well as the project elevation combination. This approach has been fully automated for path checking of entire sites, and the results are responsive to site changes over time as a project progresses. This proposed methodology is generic and thus can be easily applied to check lift paths for entire industrial plants or similar projects.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: automation; mobile crane; modular construction; path planning; project planning and design
Index terms: module, automation, methodology, modular construction, project planning, site layout, construction site
Subjects: automation and robotics, architectural elements, research methods, building construction, control systems, site logistics, work location
Topics: Project Management, Research Practice, Construction Technology, Digital Applications, Design Practice, Site Management
Descriptive scope: 3 PCT

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here