Li, J; Chiang, Y H; Choi, T N Y and Man, K F (2013) Determinants of efficiency of contractors in Hong Kong and China: Panel data model analysis. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 139(9), pp. 1211-1223. ISSN 0733-9364
Abstract
This study investigates how firm attributes affect construction contractors' efficiency in Hong Kong and Mainland China, from the period 2004 to 2010. This study finds that the efficiency of Hong Kong contractors is associated with their managerial capability to control business costs and financial capability to manage both short-term and long-term capital liquidity. The efficiency of Mainland China contractors is also associated with their managerial capability to control business and administrative costs but not with their financial capability to maintain capital liquidity. Theoretically, this study shows that managerial and technological abilities are two common factors that transcend different institutions and systems. Hong Kong is the freest economy in the world, whereas the economy of Mainland China is more regulated. Methodologically, data envelopment analysis is adopted to establish the efficiency scores of contractors to be analyzed by panel data regression, which controls individual contractor's return to scale. Few construction competitiveness studies have attempted this methodological process, which can be replicated for future research in other countries, at different stages of their economic development, to ensure equally useful measures for cross-country comparison and to promote the sustainable developments of their construction industries.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | China; construction contractor; firm efficiency; Hong Kong; panel data model; quantitative methods |
| Index terms: | determinant, Hong Kong, economic development, competitiveness, data envelopment analysis, construction industry, efficiency, sustainable development, construction contractor, China, data model, liquidity, quantitative method |
| Subjects: | market analysis, data analysis and analytics, data science, economic analysis, practitioner, Geography, economic development, industry analysis, risk assessment, health safety and environment, performance management |
| Topics: | Risk Management, Sustainability, Quality Management, Health and Safety, Research Practice, Business Strategy, Roles and Professions, Digital Applications, Geographical Context |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCTA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here