Minchin, R E; Cui, S; Walters, R C; Issa, R and Pan, J (2013) Sino-American opinions and perceptions of counterfeiting in the construction supply chain. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 139(1), pp. 1-8. ISSN 0733-9364
Abstract
Incidents of counterfeit products harming humans have been widely reported in the western press. Counterfeit handbags and jeans are easily obtainable at several well-known locations around the world, including many in the United States. The construction industry is not immune from the worldwide problems of counterfeiting. Research reported on by this paper identified the center of the problem as the People's Republic of China (PRC). In addition, the research concluded that there are significant differences in the attitudes toward counterfeiting exhibited by people living and working in North America and those living and working in the PRC. The research, based on almost 200 interviews, revealed that most Chinese manufacturers believe that "close enough is good enough" and many Chinese have a hard time understanding why that is not acceptable to the U.S. market. Of course, many U.S. and Canadian companies have had great success procuring quality material and products from China, but most have achieved this success through extensive education and training of the Chinese manufacturer and supplier, and excruciating diligence in the oversight of their entire supply chain.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | China; construction materials; cost; counterfeit; quality management; supply chain |
| Index terms: | construction supply chain, construction material, education and training, quality management, construction industry, China, interview, manufacturer, United States |
| Subjects: | Geography, professional education, industry analysis, quality assurance, data collection methods, construction logistics, practitioner, building materials |
| Topics: | Roles and Professions, Geographical Context, Research Practice, Engineering Principles, Education, Quality Management, Supply Chain Management |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCTE |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here