Minchin, R E; Thurn, S B; Ellis, R D and Lewis, D W (2013) Using contractor bid amounts to estimate the impact of night construction on cost for transportation construction. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 139(8), pp. 1055-1062. ISSN 0733-9364
Abstract
Many studies have documented the merits and problems of nighttime work for highway construction. Most of these studies have examined the safety of the construction site for workers or the traveling public. Illumination standards, sign requirements, and crash rate data have been studied to determine whether crash rates increase during nighttime hours, and the reasons for these crashes. Few studies have addressed either the effects on cost or productivity that nighttime construction has on a project. This study used hard bid unit prices to focus on the effect that performing certain construction activities at night has on cost and productivity. Specifically, the study assumes that a contractor's bid amount reflects expected relative project productivity and answers the question, "What impact, if any, does night work have on construction productivity and therefore bid price?" This is the first paper to answer both questions as related. Among the results was the fact that for the most part, the owner would have saved millions of dollars by allowing the contractor the option of working at night or during the day, though some items were bid lowest if the contract allowed for night work only.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | construction; highway; illumination; lighting; night; nighttime; productivity |
| Index terms: | estimate, option, highway construction, construction activity, construction site, productivity, owner, construction productivity |
| Subjects: | work location, decision analysis, sociology, management, construction operations, financial and cost management, operations management, civil engineering |
| Topics: | Cost Management, Project Management, Site Management, Stakeholder Management, Business Strategy, Engineering Principles, Risk Management |
| Descriptive scope: | 2 PC |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here