Mitropoulos, P and Memarian, B (2013) Task demands in masonry work: Sources, performance implications, and management strategies. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 139(5), pp. 581-590. ISSN 0733-9364
Abstract
Construction work involves significant physical, mental, and temporal demands. High task demands increase the likelihood of errors, with implications for rework, safety, and productivity. To ensure the safety and productive efficiency of workers, it is important to better understand the task demands and manage them effectively. This exploratory study investigated the task demands in masonry work, the factors that generate the demands, the influence of demands on performance, and the practices that field supervisors use to manage/regulate them. Data were collected on two masonry projects. The NASA Task Load Index (TLX) was used to measure the workers' subjective assessment of task demands. The members of masonry crews perceived different type and level of task demands depending on their role - supervisor, masons, laborers, and operator. Interviews with the crew members identified design features and work practices that influenced the task demands. Extensive field observations identified three strategies that field supervisors use to manage task demands: (1) matching task demands with capabilities; (2) reducing temporal demands; and (3) shifting task demands between roles. Finally, data were collected on performance problems with emphasis on delays, mistakes, rework, and safety incidents. Rework often involved higher task demands and hazards than the normal tasks. The study contributes to practice by identifying factors that increase the task demands of masonry activities and that need to be managed to improve performance. In terms of research, the study identifies and measures the multiple task demands for the different masonry crew roles, identifies sources of task demands, and strategies to manage them.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | errors; masonry; mental demands; nasa-tlx; physical demands; productivity; safety; task demands; work organization; workload |
| Index terms: | work practice, interview, workload, exploratory study, rework, strategy, construction work, supervisor, management strategy, efficiency, productivity, mason |
| Subjects: | performance management, research methods, management, practitioner, data collection methods, operations management |
| Topics: | Organizational Design, Human Resources, Quality Management, Roles and Professions, Project Management, Research Practice, Business Strategy |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PCE |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here